To begin with. reading has always been important in my life. My mom told stories of my Aunt Carolyn reading me to sleep. My mother told me that was the beginning of my thirst for reading. I remember growing up that I could never go to sleep without reading first. I even read Shogun every year because I loved that book. My family jokes that I read the entire encyclopedia. That is untrue but I did enjoy reading it from time to time as a way of learning new stuff. I proudly claim that I read the last Harry Potter book in one day. So, how am I now a statistic of reading decline? What has replaced my reading?
Now, I find my spare time spent watching TV or on the internet. My reading is now done in snippets and not marathon chunks. IS this bad? Am I deteriorating into a pre-Renaissance man or is this the next stage in evolution? Short articles and shows squeeze my relaxation time as does physical activity. Do I not make time for reading or is reading antiquated.
Reading books has three distinct advantages in my opinion. Reading a book increases your vocabulary. I cannot see how it could not. It contains so many words you cannot help but run across some you do not know. Also, seeing these words used in literature helps to solidify them in our minds. Another advantage is that reading allows us to immerse ourselves int eh mind of a character. Books are great about that. the ability to see inside a characters minds is unlocking secrets to our own. Finally, reading helps engage and activate the mind. The mind has to work hard as we read. It does not just absorb the information. It has to manipulate it and turn it into images and unravel its mysteries.
TV and the new short media has its one advantages. TV and other brief media are brief. The ability to get information quickly is great. Books take hours, while TV takes an hour or less. In our current world time is precious. TV also allows us to immerse in situations. We can suspend our reality for awhile. Finally, TV allows us to multi task. At this moment, I am listening to an interview while typing. It allows us to do two things at once. It engages our eyes and ears keeping our brain firing rapidly. More firing means more productivity. Is that a bad thing? Or is it just background noise to dull our thoughts and keep us comfortably numb.
Books have been used to stir the minds of populations and inspire people to rise to action. Common Sense, The Bible, Democracy in America, and On Liberty are just a few. Even entertaining books, such as Gulliver's Travels, were written to speak out against people and policies. Not all books have this impact or goal, but have we lost something because our reading habits need short lengths so the brain cannot be challenged and changed from extended exposure. Is TV and the internet now just a marketing tool? With so much misinformation and focus group studies being used, are we allowing TV to brainwash us? Before I become a luddite, TV and the internet are not from Satan. They bring quick information that is quickly digested. We are now able to be more informed than most governments were 60 years ago. We even get the information quicker than 40 years ago. More information is not a bad thing, right? Information is the key correct. We do not have years to wait on a book to be written. We are involved in the world today and change happens in the blink of the eye. What is right and what is wrong?
As a Literature teacher I want people to read but my habits do not espouse that policy. Is it bad not to read much? I am interested to hear the opinion of all two of you out there reading my blog. Should we read more, and how is it helpful? I am leaving this article unfinished, because I want your opinion.
